Service · Vibe Coding Rescue
Vibe CodingRescue
You shipped an MVP from Cursor / Lovable / Bolt. You have users. Now it can't keep up.
Vibe Coding is the biggest shift in software in 2025–2026: founders building entire products by chatting with AI. Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, v0, Replit, Windsurf. By the end of a weekend — you have a working product.
That's excellent. It lets thousands of founders who couldn't code before get an idea live. But that's where the story gets complicated.
The product works. Users sign up. Then they start saying "it's slow." A bug that won't go away. You try to add a feature — everything falls apart. The next developer reviews the code and delivers the verdict: "Throw this out and start over."
We don't think you should throw it out. We think you should rescue it.
01 / Why it falls
Why Vibe Coding products break in production
The same patterns repeat in every project. We know them, know where to look, and know how to fix them.
02 / What the product needs now
Rescue, takeover or maintenance — what does your product need?
Not every stuck product needs a "rescue". Sometimes the code is fine and what is missing is someone responsible for it. Sometimes the problem is that the previous team vanished with the access. The three situations call for different deliverables.
03 / What we do
What we do
From code audit to refactoring, security fixes, performance work and team training — everything your product needs to hold up in production.
04 / What we don't do
What we don't do
05 / Receiving a product from another team
What happens when a product arrives from another team
An orderly takeover is mostly a checklist of verifications and a list of access. Before touching the code, we make sure that you — not us and not the previous team — own every asset.
- 01
Asset and access inventory
Code repositories, servers, domain and DNS, databases, cloud accounts, third-party services, app stores, API keys. For each — who is the registered owner and who holds a password.
- 02
Ownership transfer before fixes
Every asset registered to the previous team is moved to you. Passwords are rotated. Only then does the work begin — otherwise every fix depends on someone who is no longer in the picture.
- 03
Local run and clean build
If the product cannot be run on a clean machine from the code in the repository, there is a gap between what runs in production and what you actually hold. That gap is documented and closed first.
- 04
A defined handover window
If the previous team is available — a short handover with a closed list of questions. If not — the unknowns are documented as risks, not as assumptions.
The full takeover checklist
We laid out every asset, check and transition step in a separate guide, so you can go through it even before talking to us.
Software project takeover checklist06 / Tools we know
We know their signatures
Every Vibe Coding tool has its own patterns of problems. We work with projects from all of them — and recognizing the pattern is half the battle.
- Cursor
- Lovable
- Bolt
- v0
- Replit
- Windsurf
- GitHub Copilot
- Claude Code
- Cody
- Continue
- Aider
07 / How we work
How we work
- 01
Initial code review
We get access to the code and run a thorough review. The review duration and timeline are set after mapping the product, the access it needs and the scope of work.
- 02
Prioritized report
What's critical, what's important, what you can live with. With time and cost estimates.
- 03
Rescue plan
We plan together what to fix, in what order, at what scope. Realistic — based on budget and time.
- 04
Iterative execution
Fixes in sprints. Each sprint — a package of improvements shipped to production. No long "freeze."
- 05
Tests & verification
Every change — covered by tests. We don't break what already works.
- 06
Mentoring your team
Your developers (if you have any) learn along the way — so this doesn't happen again.
08 / What the diagnosis delivers
What you receive at the end of the diagnosis stage
The diagnosis is a deliverable in its own right. Even if you decide to continue with another team, this is what stays with you.
09 / What's included and what's a separate project
What rescue and maintenance include — and what counts as a separate project
This boundary is what prevents surprises on the invoice. The table describes the typical division of responsibility; the exact scope is written in your proposal.
| Type of work | Rescue | Ongoing maintenance | Separate project |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnosis and prioritized report | Included — this is the first stage | Included as a periodic review, at the agreed scope | — |
| Bug fixes and stability | Included — in the order set by the report | Included, up to the agreed hours cap | — |
| Dependency and security updates | Included when they are part of stabilization | Included — frequency set in the agreement | A major version upgrade that requires a rewrite |
| Monitoring and incident response | Setting up basic monitoring is included | Included — response times and on-call scope are set in the agreement, not on this page | — |
| New features | Not included — opened as a scope extension | Small improvements included; a new screen or flow — not | Yes — priced and planned separately |
| Architecture rewrite or technology replacement | Only if the report concludes there is no alternative | Not included | Yes — with its own migration plan |
10 / Who it's for
Who this is for
11 / Why us
Why us
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
After an initial code audit, we'll know. In most cases — the project is rescuable. Only extreme cases require rebuilding from scratch.
There is no honest flat price for a rescue: the budget follows scope. The drivers are the size of the codebase, how much of it is actually in production, whether there are users and data to protect, and how deep the diagnosis needs to go before the plan is written. We scope the work first, then give a fixed, itemized quote — what is included, what is excluded and what would change the number. The diagnosis is a fixed, small engagement; its cost is rolled into the work if you choose to continue with us.
Depends on depth. Critical fixes (security, stability) — 2 to 4 weeks. Meaningful improvement — 1 to 3 months. A full overhaul — 3 to 6 months.
Yes. Many clients continue with us after the first stage — as an ongoing dev team or as mentors to their in-house team.
Yes. We work with projects from all of these tools. Each one has a characteristic "signature" of problems.
Absolutely. We even recommend it — with the right guardrails. We put a workflow in place where Cursor is an assistant, not the sole author. With code reviews, tests and CI around it.
Yes. We work in-flight. Changes are planned in advance and rolled out gradually. The service doesn't stop.
Yes. Everything is yours. The code, the repository, the accounts. We help from the outside.
Yes. If after the review we recommend a rebuild (it happens occasionally), we build it too. But it's our second choice — we always prefer to rescue if we can.
A process with tests, code reviews, and CI/CD. Every change is verified. You see everything in real time.
Yes. Same principle — code that works but is problematic for production. A rescue is a rescue.
Book a meeting. We'll take a look together and give you an honest read. No strings attached.
Keep reading
- ComparisonVibe Coding vs production engineering — when each one fitsMVPs from Cursor/Lovable/Bolt vs production-engineered code. What AI tools handle, where they break, and how to migrate between the two.
- Case studyCase study: Tory — on-demand mobile servicesWe built a client app, a driver app, and a real-time dispatch backend from scratch. Architecture, matching engine, and an order flow measured in seconds.
- ServiceTechnology & product consulting — the decision before the buildA one-off consultation, a professional audit with a recommendations document, or ongoing CTO advisory. Architecture, code review, development and AI strategy — with no commitment to build with us.
Let's talk
Don't throw it out. Rescue it.
A 30-minute intro call. No strings attached. Send us the code, we'll look, and tell you what we see — and how to rescue it.
Straight. To the point. On time.