Service · Web Accessibility (ADA + WCAG 2.2)
WebAccessibility
Accessibility isn't a "nice to have." It's the law. And it's also good business.
Under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, courts across the US treat websites and apps as places of public accommodation. Thousands of accessibility lawsuits are filed every year — most of them against businesses that never got a warning first.
In June 2025 the European Accessibility Act came into force as well: any company selling digital services into Europe — website, app, SaaS — must be accessible, even if the sale is purely online. Beyond the law: about one in four US adults lives with some form of disability. If your site isn't accessible, you're closing the door on a quarter of your market.
We do real accessibility. Not a widget you slap onto the site and hope nobody notices.
01
No widgets
A widget doesn't fix an inaccessible site. It just hides the problem.
You've seen the ads for "one-click accessibility solutions"? A button that pops up offering "high contrast" and "larger text"? That's not accessibility. That's theater.
In the US, thousands of lawsuits have been filed against companies that relied on these widgets. Courts have ruled again and again: a widget is not a substitute for accessibility in code. Real accessibility is built from the start — in the HTML, in the design, in the content. Not in a button floating in the corner.
02 / What we do
What we do
From a comprehensive accessibility audit to in-code implementation, the legal statement, training, and ongoing monitoring — everything an accessible site requires.
03 / Standards
The standards we work to
We know every major standard — American, European and international. We work to whatever the law in your jurisdiction requires, and to the latest version of WCAG.
04 / How we work
How we work
- 01
Initial review
We take the site or app and run a comprehensive review. Manual plus automated — because automated tools only catch ~30% of the issues.
- 02
Prioritized report
A report that shows what to fix, in what order, and how urgently. Not a 500-item list with no context.
- 03
In-code remediation
Proper semantic structure, ARIA, keyboard navigation, color contrast, alt text, visible focus. All of it.
- 04
Testing with real users
Not just automated tools. We test with users who rely on screen readers, keyboard navigation, and other assistive tech.
- 05
Accessibility statement
We draft the statement to legal spec. Published on the site.
- 06
Ongoing maintenance
Accessibility is a process, not a project that closes. Sites that change introduce new issues. We keep the level high over time.
05 / Who it's for
Who this is for
06 / Why us
Why us
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
If you do business in the US — almost certainly yes. Courts apply Title III of the ADA to websites and apps, and plaintiffs' firms file thousands of suits a year on that basis. If you sell into Europe, the EAA applies as well. Non-compliance leads to demand letters, lawsuits, settlements and remediation on someone else's timeline.
The ADA itself does not name a technical standard, which is why courts and the Department of Justice consistently point to WCAG — currently 2.1 or 2.2 at level AA — as the measure of an accessible site. Meeting WCAG 2.2 AA in the code is the defensible position.
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act requires federal agencies — and vendors selling to them — to make their digital products accessible, measured against WCAG 2.0 AA. If you sell software to the federal government, or to states that mirror it, it applies to you.
No. Widgets don't make a site accessible — they hide the problems. US courts have ruled repeatedly that an overlay is not a substitute for accessibility in the code, and companies relying on widgets are sued at the same rate as everyone else.
There is no honest flat price for accessibility work: the budget follows scope. The drivers are the number of templates and components, how much of the problem is in the design versus the code, whether there is a design system to fix once, and whether you need a one-off remediation or accessibility built into an ongoing product. We scope the work first, then give a fixed, itemized quote — what is included, what is excluded and what would change the number. The first step is always an audit, and the audit is what the quote is based on.
A small site — 2 to 4 weeks. A medium site — 1 to 2 months. A complex system — 2 to 4 months.
Don't ignore it. Contact us immediately. There's typically a 60-day window to fix the issues — we know how to work fast and effectively in that situation.
Yes. In the legally required format, written clearly. Includes accessibility features and contact info for the accessibility coordinator.
The same rules apply. iOS and Android have built-in accessibility APIs that we implement properly — VoiceOver, TalkBack, Dynamic Type, and more.
Day one. Adding accessibility at the end costs 5-10× more than building with it from the start.
It is strongly recommended. A public accessibility statement describes the standard you work to, the known gaps and how users can reach you, and it is one of the first things plaintiffs' attorneys and regulators look for. We write it with you as part of the work, and keep it honest.
Part of accessibility. Images need alt text, videos need captions, PDFs need to be accessible (not just scanned images). We handle all of it.
Let's talk
Is your site accessible?
An initial accessibility audit, no strings attached. We'll tell you exactly where you stand — and what needs to be fixed.
Straight. To the point. On time.